For Milestone 2 provide your final outline for the paper. Additionally, provide an annotated bibliography containing at least 4 scholarly sources for your paper, in APA format. An annotated bibliography provides the citation for each source, as well as approximately one paragraph for each source assessing its credibility and how it is useful in your research. The How to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography resource Download How to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography resourcecan help you as you develop your annotated bibliography.
For the Course Project, you will write about a historical event between 1865 and the present day from the perspective of a historical figure who participated in the event.
September 11th, 2001 From The Perspective of George W. Bush
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Instructor’s Name
Date
September 11th, 2001 From The Perspective of George W. Bush
Beshara, R. K. (2018). A critical discourse analysis of George W. Bush’s “war on terror” speech: The rhetoric of (counter) terrorism and the logic of Islamophobia. Journal of Language and Discrimination, 2(1), 85-112. https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.34307
The primary objective of the study was to examine George W. Bush’s address to a joint session of Congress and the American people regarding the war on terror (WOT). The researcher applied Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) together with Lacanian psychoanalysis among other critical tools to accomplish the study objective. According to Beshara (2018), the social interest around Presidents Bush’s war on terror speech is terrorism. According to the author, Bush referred to the terrorists as enemies of freedom who committed the act of war against Americans. Terrorism is a real problem that is ill-defined inside and outside academia. This paper is useful in the topic of study because it tries to understand President Bush’s perspective of the war on terror concerning the event of September 11th, 2001.
Alkhawaldeh, A. M., & Ladiqi, S. (2021). The United States of America’s Foreign Policy towards Jordan during (George W. Bush) Administration (2001-2009) (Case Study of the Events of September 11, 2001). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(3), 1270-1277. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i3/9219
This study article aimed to examine how US foreign policy changed after the event of September 11th, 2001. The author argues that the event significantly changed the United States’ foreign policy features toward many countries. Bush’s speech hinted at characteristics of what new American foreign policy would be. For instance, he announced that every nation in the world should adopt a clear stance on terrorism. The study was conducted as qualitative research using primary and secondary sources of data. The study results reveal that After the events of September 11, 2001, United States foreign policy’s features towards many countries changed to become the ultimate goal of the war on terror. This article is useful because it shows how Presidents Bush’s perspective of the event of September 11th, 2001 was reflected in the new American foreign policies.
Ferguson, N. (2022). Applying history in real time: a tale of two crises. Journal of Applied History, 1(aop), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1163/25895893-bja10021
The primary aim of this study is to compare the reactions of George W. Bush’s administration to two epoch-making events; the 9/11 terrorist attacks of 2001 and the 9/15 bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers in 2008. This was a literature review of many articles related to the two events. The author concluded that those concerned with national security in 2001 thought differently about risk from those concerned with financial stability in 2008. This article is useful because it tries to understand how President Bush understood the 9/11 event and the actions he took to address it.
Iskenderian, B. (2022). Naming the Enemy: An Analysis of How Presidential Rhetoric and Foreign Policy Contributed to American (Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado Boulder). https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/undergraduate_honors_theses/6682x507b
The primary objective of this study was to analyze how presidential rhetoric and foreign policy contributed to American islamophobia during the Bush, Obama, and Trump administrations. This study was also a literature review of several articles. Bush, Obama, and Trump all had a critical role in the war on terror. Bush used American fear and response to 9/11 to announce a war on terror. The word violent extremist was used by the Obama administration to define national enemies. However, Trump used the word radical Islam to describe the enemy. This article is useful because it provides President Bush’s perspective on the event of September 11th, 2001.
References
Alkhawaldeh, A. M., & Ladiqi, S. (2021). The United States of America’s Foreign Policy towards Jordan during (George W. Bush) Administration (2001-2009) (Case Study of the Events of September 11, 2001). . International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(3), 1270-1277. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i3/9219
Beshara, R. K. (2018). A critical discourse analysis of George W. Bush’s “war on terror” speech: The rhetoric of (counter) terrorism and the logic of Islamophobia. Journal of Language and Discrimination, 2(1), 85-112. https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.34307
Ferguson, N. (2022). Applying history in real time: a tale of two crises. Journal of Applied History, 1(aop), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1163/25895893-bja10021
Iskenderian, B. (2022). Naming the Enemy: An Analysis of How Presidential Rhetoric and Foreign Policy Contributed to American (Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado Boulder). https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/undergraduate_honors_theses/6682x507b