NRS 493 RS4 Literature Evaluation Table
Literature Evaluation Table
| Criteria | Article 1 | Article 2 | Article 3 | Article 4 |
| Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and
Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
|
Zheng, F., Liu, S., Liu, Y., & Deng, L. (2019). Effects of an outpatient diabetes self-management education on patients with type 2 diabetes in China: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of diabetes research, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1073131
|
Nassar, C. M., Montero, A., & Magee, M. F. (2019). Inpatient diabetes education in the real world: an overview of guidelines and delivery models. Current diabetes reports, 19(10), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-019-1222-6
|
Lee, S. K., Shin, D. H., Kim, Y. H., & Lee, K. S. (2019). Effect of diabetes education through pattern management on self-care and self-efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(18), 3323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183323
|
Chatterjee, S., Davies, M. J., Heller, S., Speight, J., Snoek, F. J., & Khunti, K. (2018). Diabetes structured self-management education programs: a narrative review and current innovations. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 6(2), 130-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30239-5 |
| Article Title and Year Published
|
Effects of an outpatient diabetes self-management education on patients with type 2 diabetes in China, 2019 | Inpatient diabetes education in the real world: an overview of guidelines and delivery models, 2019 | Effect of diabetes education through pattern management on self-care and self-efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes, 2019 | Diabetes structured self-management education programs, 2018 |
| Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)
|
Is a simple outpatient diabetes self-management education program effective? | Do hospitals face challenges in delivering inpatient diabetes education with the increase in readmission and hospitalizations? | How does applying customized diabetes management programs through pattern management affect individual self-care behaviors and self-efficacy in patients with type two diabetes mellitus? | What improvements have been seen in self-management diabetes education programs during the last two decades? |
| Purposes/Aim of Study | Assessing the effectiveness of a simple outpatient diabetes self-management education program |
Providing an overview of the current state of inpatient diabetes education using the existing guidelines and education models. |
Investigating the effect of applying customized diabetes education programs on patients’ self-care behaviors and self-efficacy. | Assessing the improvement in self-management diabetes education programs. |
| Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
|
Single-blinded randomized control study | Summary overview of the existing diabetes education models. | Nonequivalent control group pretest-protest design | Narrative review. |
| Setting/Sample
|
60 patients in an outpatients department Xiangya Hospital, Central South University | Diabetes-Specialty care models and diabetes-non-specialty care models were reviewed | Type 2 diabetes patients of age 18-70 who visited the hospital between March 2017 and September 2017 | Existing self-management diabetes education programs |
| Methods: Intervention/Instruments
|
Two-group experimental design was used. | Diabetes Education models Summary review | pretest-posttest design to test the effects of PM-based diabetes education utilizing CGMS results of patients with diabetes | Systematic reviews of diabetes self-management education programs done between 2012 and 2017 |
| Analysis
|
SDSDA, PAID, FBG, postprandrial2 h
blood glucose, and HbA1c tests were all performed to evaluate the effects of interventions for both groups before and After three months. |
The existing inpatient diabetes education models were discussed in line with their reported outcomes | The effects on self-efficacy and self-care behavior were analyzed using ANOVA. Collected data was analyzed using SPSS version 22 | Analysis of the evidence-based reports of the articles reviewed. |
| Key Findings
|
For the control group, Scores of the diabetes self-care activities significantly improved in the intervention group after the intervention | Inpatient diabetes education should provide survival skills for self-management upon discharge until more outpatient education is provided. | Positive changes in self-care behavior were observed. Self-care behaviors improved after diabetes education programs | There is an increase in self-empowerment in self–management diabetes education models. There is an integration of psychosocial models in diabetes education. |
| Recommendations
|
Diabetes self-management education can improve psychological conditions and glycemic control in T2DM. | Both diabetes specialty care models and diabetes non-specialty care models can be used successfully for inpatient diabetes education. | Customized diabetes education programs specific to each patient’s characteristics should be developed. | Psychosocial issues and communication should be considered in self-management education. |
| Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project
|
The article provides evidence of the impact of education on patients with type 2 diabetes. The article shows that well-structured education is the basis of patient responsibility and increases patient self-management. | The article provides an overview of inpatient patient education. It shows the superiority of structured education to other forms of patient education. It also alternatives for patient education. | The article introduces the importance of education in increasing self-efficacy and self-management. It supports that patient education is the best intervention to improve self-efficacy and self-management because diabetes care is highly dependent on patients’ interventions. | The study shows that structured education programs utilizing nursing terminologies are the best interventions to deliver quality education. The standardized terminologies are vital in covering patients’ differences |
| Criteria | Article 5 | Article 6 | Article 7 | Article 8 |
| Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and
Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
|
Ghisi, G. L. D. M., Seixas, M. B., Pereira, D. S., Cisneros, L. L., Ezequiel, D. G. A., Aultman, C., Sandison, N., Oh, P., & da Silva, L. P. (2021). Patient education program for Brazilians living with diabetes and prediabetes: findings from a development study. BMC public health, 21(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11300-y
|
Xu, G., Liu, B., Sun, Y., Du, Y., Snetselaar, L. G., Hu, F. B., & Bao, W. (2018). Prevalence of diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes among U.S. adults in 2016 and 2017: a population-based study. Bmj, 362. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k1497
|
Rahaman, H. S., Jyotsna, V. P., Sreenivas, V., Krishnan, A., & Tandon, N. (2018). Effectiveness of a patient education module on diabetic foot care in outpatient setting: An open-label randomized controlled study. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 22(1), 74. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_148_17 | Galaviz, K. I., Weber, M. B., Straus, A., Haw, J. S., Narayan, K. V., & Ali, M. K. (2018). Global diabetes prevention interventions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the real-world impact on incidence, weight, and glucose. Diabetes Care, 41(7), 1526-1534. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-2222
|
| Article Title and Year Published
|
Patient education program for Brazilians living with diabetes and prediabetes: findings from a development study, 2021 | Prevalence of diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes among U.S. adults in 2016 and 2017: a population-based study, 2018 | Effectiveness of a patient education module on diabetic foot care in outpatient setting: An open-label randomized controlled study. | Global diabetes prevention interventions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the real-world impact on incidence, weight, and glucose, 2018 |
| Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)
|
Can there be a diabetes education program that is specifically applicable to Brazilians living with diabetes? | How prevalent is diabetes type 1 and 2 among us adults? | How effective is the foot care education module that the team had developed? | Can LSM strategies implemented under real-world conditions lower diabetes risk and promote weight loss? |
| Purposes/Aim of Study | Develop a diabetes patient education program applicable to the Brazilian population living with diabetes. | Estimating the prevalence of diagnosed total diabetes type 1 and 2 in the U.S. general population and the proportion among U.S. adults. | Assessing the effectiveness of a foot care education module the authors had developed. | The purpose of this study was to synthesize global evidence on the impact of LSM strategies on diabetes incidence and risk factors in one parsimonious model. |
| Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
|
Narrative of existing diabetes education programs | Nationwide, population-based, cross-sectional survey | Randomized controlled study | Epidemiological study design |
| Setting/Sample
|
Both inpatient and outpatient Brazilians living with diabetes. Diabetes patient educators | National health interview survey 2016 and 2017. U.S. adults aged 20 and above | 165 Adult patients diagnosed with Diabetes type 1 or 2 attending endocrinology from July 2015 to December 2016 | PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies published between January 1990 and April 2015. |
| Methods: Intervention/Instruments
|
Review of the development process of diabetes patient education programs. | Data was collected through NHIS and standardized questionnaires. | Block randomization was used to divide the patients into a control group and an intervention group | Meta-analysis was used to obtain evidence of the effects |
| Analysis
|
Best practices in diabetes education programs in Brazil and South America were analyzed using systematic reviews. | Data was statistically analyzed using survey weights. | Randomized control trials were used to analyze the effect of healthcare education on foot care knowledge and behavior in diabetes patients. | random-effects meta-analysis techniques were applied to obtain a pooled pre/post mean difference for weight and glucose outcomes among intervention participants |
| Key Findings
|
Development phases of a diabetes education program were explained. A program applicable to Brazilian patients was developed. | The study provided benchmark estimates on the national prevalence of diagnosed type 1 diabetes (0.5%) and type 2 diabetes (8.5%) among U.S. adults. Among U.S. adults with diagnosed diabetes, type 1 and type 2 diabetes accounted for 5.6% and 91.2%, respectively. | The module was effective. Persistent change in foot care behavior requires the patient to have reinforcement regularly. | The study found that participants receiving an intervention had a 29% lower risk of developing diabetes, lost 1.5 kg more body weight, and reduced FBG by 0.09 mmol/L more than participants not receiving one. |
| Recommendations
|
The program’s effectiveness must be tested in the future as meeting individual needs requires sustained efforts. |
The study recommends further investigations into the disparities in the prevalence | The study recommends further improvement on the diabetes patient education module | Even though LSM strategies can succeed in diabetes prevention, the study recommends further studies in low-income countries. |
| Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone
|
The article shows the applicability and importance of education in diabetes care. The article provides evidence of increased self-management and better patient education after diabetes education, hence proving the project’s viability. | The article provides data on the real-world prevalence of diabetes. It portrays it as a priority clinical problem. In addition, it recommends specific interventions such as mass awareness and patient education to reduce the diabetes healthcare burden. | The article reviews the costs of diabetes. It also reviews its interventions and preventability. The article recommends rigorous public sensitization and patient education to prevent diabetes and its complications | The article reviews the global diabetes prevention interventions. Diabetes education features as an essential intervention in the prevention and prognosis of diabetes. |