It is one of the most clich of clichs, but it nevertheless rings true

  • Post category:Nursing
  • Reading time:24 mins read

It is one of the most clich of clichs, but it nevertheless rings true: The only constant is change. As a nursing professional, you are no doubt aware that success in the healthcare field requires the ability to adapt to change, as the pace of change in healthcare may be without rival.

As a professional, you will be called upon to share expertise, inform, educate, and advocate. Your efforts in these areas can help lead others through change. In this Assignment, you will propose a change within your organization and present a comprehensive plan to implement the change you propose.

To Prepare:

Review the Resources and identify one change that you believe is called for in your organization/workplace.
This may be a change necessary to effectively address one or more of the issues you addressed in the Workplace Environment Assessment you submitted in Module 4. It may also be a change in response to something not addressed in your previous efforts. It may be beneficial to discuss your ideas with your organizational leadership and/or colleagues to help identify and vet these ideas.
Reflect on how you might implement this change and how you might communicate this change to organizational leadership.
The Assignment (5-6-minute narrated PowerPoint presentation):

Change Implementation and Management Plan

Create a 5- or 6-slide narrated PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose.

Your narrated presentation should be 5–6 minutes in length.

Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following:

An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (This can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment previously submitted, if relevant.)
A description of the change being proposed
Justifications for the change, including why addressing it will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace
Details about the type and scope of the proposed change
Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the change
Identification of a change management team (by title/role)
A plan for communicating the change you propose
A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the change you propose

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

  • Chapter 4, “Practice Model Design, Implementation, and Evaluation” (pp. 99–154)

Cullen, L., & Adams, S. L. (2012). Planning for implementation of evidence-based practice. Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(4), 222–230.

 

Pollack, J., & Pollack, R. (2015). Using Kotter’s eight stage process to manage an organizational change program: Presentation and practice. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(1), 51-66.          Pollack, J., & Pollack, R. (2015). Using kotter’s eight stage process to manage an organisational change program: Presentation and practice. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(1), 51-66. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11213-014-9317-0

 

Seijts, G. H., & Gandz, J. (2016). Transformational change and leader character. Business Horizons, 61(2), 239-249.         https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.11.005

 

Tistad, M., Palmcrantz, S., Wallin, L., Ehrenberg, A., Olsson, C. B., Tomson, G., …Eldh, A. C. (2016). Developing leadership in managers to facilitate the implementation of national guideline recommendations: A process evaluation of feasibility and usefulness. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 5(8), 477–486. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.35. Retrieved from http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3183_5015382bcf9183a74ef7e79b0a941f65.pdf

 

Required Media

TEDx. (2013, January). Six keys to leading positive change: Rosabeth Moss Kanter at TEDxBeaconStreet [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owU5aTNPJbs

 

Optional Resources

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHhqWbI0y4M

Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan

( a narrated 6-8 minute professional powerpoint (or Kaltura) presentation)

It is one of the most cliché of clichés, but it nevertheless rings true: The only constant is change. As a nursing professional, you are no doubt aware that success in the healthcare field requires the ability to adapt to change, as the pace of change in healthcare may be without rival.

As a professional, you will be called upon to share expertise, inform, educate, and advocate. Your efforts in these areas can help lead others through change. In this Assignment, you will propose a change within your organization and present a comprehensive plan to implement the change you propose.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and identify one change that you believe is called for in your organization/workplace.
    • This may be a change necessary to effectively address one or more of the issues you addressed in the Workplace Environment Assessment you submitted in Module 4. It may also be a change in response to something not addressed in your previous efforts. It may be beneficial to discuss your ideas with your organizational leadership and/or colleagues to help identify and vet these ideas.
  • Reflect on how you might implement this change and how you might communicate this change to organizational leadership.

The Assignment (5-6-minute narrated PowerPoint presentation):

Change Implementation and Management Plan

Create a 5- or 6-slide narrated PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose.

Your narrated presentation should be 5–6 minutes in length.

Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following:

  • An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (This can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment previously submitted, if relevant.)
  • A description of the change being proposed
  • Justifications for the change, including why addressing it will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace
  • Details about the type and scope of the proposed change
  • Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the change
  • Identification of a change management team (by title/role)
  • A plan for communicating the change you propose
  • A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the change you propose

 

 

 

 

RUBRIC

Create a 5- or 6-slide PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose. Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following:

  • An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (this can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment).
  • A description of the changes being proposed.
  • Justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace.–

Excellent 36 (36%) – 40 (40%)

Good 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

Fair 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

Poor 0 (0%) – 27 (27%)

 

  • Details about the type and scope of the proposed changes.
  • Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the changes.
  • Identification of a change management team (by title/role).
  • A plan for communicating the changes you propose.
  • A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the changes you propose.–

Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

 

Resource Synthesis–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Fair 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Poor 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

 

 

 

 

Presentation Narration–

Excellent 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Good 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Fair 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Poor 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

 

PowerPoint Presentation:

The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.–

 

Excellent 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

Good 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Fair 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Poor 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

 

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.–

 

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Fair 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Poor 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Resources:

Planning for Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice

 

Complete Reference:

Cullen, L. & Adams, S. L. (2012). Planning for Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 42 (4), 222-230. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31824ccd0a.

 

Abstract

Expectations for evidence-based healthcare are growing, yet the most difficult step in the process, implementation, is often left to busy nursing leaders who may be unprepared for the challenge. Selecting from the long list of implementation strategies and knowing when to apply them are a bit of an “art,” matching clinician needs and organizational context. This article describes an application-oriented resource that nursing leaders can use to plan evidence-based practice implementation in complex healthcare systems.

Nurses in leadership positions have responsibility for provision of evidence-based healthcare that meets the expectations of patients, families, regulators and others.1-3 Research shows that use of evidence is inconsistent. Basic practices from hand hygiene to early ambulation are difficult to implement. Nursing leaders are expanding use of evidence-based care delivery to improve patient and organizational outcomes by developing the infrastructure, defining the processes, strategically planning for implementation, and reporting results.One of the 1st steps when defining the process is to select an evidence-based practice (EBP) model.4,5 Several models have been developed to guide organizational and project leaders through the steps of the EBP process.6-10 Most of these process models include similar steps such as identifying a problem, critiquing the evidence, implementing evidence-based recommendations, evaluating the change, and disseminating results. Despite extensive use of EBP process models, it is understood that additional guidance may be needed at each step. Recent attention is now focusing on the indistinct step of implementation.11-14Failure to provide guidance for use of effective implementation strategies promotes the use of ineffective strategies, or worse, no strategy at all. This results in “reduced patient care quality and raises costs for all, the worst of both worlds.”15(p380) It has been demonstrated that change happens over time; the literature provides little direction for nurses regarding when to use specific strategies. Insights from implementation science and successful EBP work indicate that application of implementation strategies varies over the course of the EBP process. Assisting nurses at the point of care in leading EBP projects16 has led to creation of a 4-phase approach for planning implementation. 16This article provides clinicians and nursing leaders with an application-oriented approach to organize, plan, and select strategies for implementation of EBP changes. This guide is meant to supplement EBP process models, not replace them. It is designed to be simple and intuitive.

Implementation Strategies for Evidence-Based Practice

The Implementation Strategies for Evidence-Based Practice guide (Figure 1) is organized to assist nurses responsible for EBP in selecting implementation strategies to help practitioners and clinical teams move clinical practice recommendations into routine workflow in practice. Strategies are selected and positioned to enhance the movement through 4 phases of implementation: creating awareness and interest, building knowledge and commitment, promoting action and adoption, and pursuing integration and sustainability to promote application by nursing and team leaders.

 

Figure 1

Evidence-Based Practice Implementation guide. *Implementation strategy supported by some empirical evidence.The implementation phases are displayed as columns progressing from awareness to integration. Each column includes strategies based on the goal for that implementation phase. Implementation strategies also target 2 distinct groups and are arranged in rows accordingly. The 1st section specifically targets the practitioners and organizational leaders, including key stakeholders. The 2nd section builds support for the practice change in the organizational system or context. Project leaders select implementation strategies that are appropriate for their particular unit and organization as the EBP initiative progresses across phases. Although the guide is diagrammed in a linear format for ease of use, the process is not directly linear and is fluid across implementation phases. In a clinical team, practitioners may be in different phases or move forward or back across phases in a nonlinear manner. Multiple strategies added cumulatively from each phase will need to be carried over for use throughout the process to keep implementation progressing.A large list of strategies is included (Figure 1), and with varying amount of evidence to support them. The implementation strategies with empirical evidence in healthcare are marked with asterisks. Few strategies have empirical evidence using rigorous study designs with additional support from reported application in practice or exclusively addressing nursing; therefore, other practical but less well-tested strategies to support application are included as well. Because research evaluation of strategies across a variety of healthcare settings and with various healthcare workers is lacking, a simplified system of identification is used instead of an extensive grading schema.

Creating Awareness and Interest

Implementation begins by focusing on strategies to create awareness and interest among clinicians and stakeholders (column 1, Figure 1). These suggested strategies should be started early in the EBP process and will likely be needed to some degree during the implementation and sustainment phases. Interest wanes over time because of competing demands and staff turnover. Multifaceted, ongoing strategies are needed to keep the practice change in the forefront.Highlighting the positive characteristics of an EBP change such as the anticipated advantage of the change and the compatibility with group values can promote awareness and interest among clinicians.17-19 Staff attendance at continuing educational programs20 increases awareness and interest in practice updates in general. Nurse leaders can continue garnering resources to support these professional development activities with application for practice. Integrating a journal club into the implementation process by choosing multiple, high-quality, project-related articles can serve a dual purpose: expanding nurses’ interest and knowledge regarding the desired practice change while advancing article critiquing skills.21 Journal club review of articles on a single clinical topic can be used to guide policy updates, staff education, and auditing of important indicators to improve care.Although empirical evidence is limited, creating slogans and logos can be a successful and fun way to grab the attention of busy clinicians.22,23 Creating a contest to generate ideas for project slogans can get staff involved, increasing their awareness and commitment to practice changes. Strategically placing project logos and slogans on project-related materials throughout implementation (eg, resource manual or materials, reminders, and data feedback) helps busy clinicians quickly refocus on the EBP and their role in promoting adoption of the practice change.24 Posting announcements may generate awareness of a particular practice update, but require additional reinforcement, for example, supplementing with discussions during unit in-services or staff meetings.Involve senior executives early in the EBP process. Senior leaders want to be supportive of clinician-driven EBP and need sufficient information about the purpose, resource needs, and anticipated return on investment. Leadership from senior executives has a demonstrated impact on uptake and sustained use of EBP recommendations.1,25-27 Announcements from senior leaders create an urgency about an issue, articulate an organizational commitment, and demonstrate the availability of resources and support that an impact is expected matching organizational priorities.

Building Knowledge and Commitment

Interventions that increase practitioner’s knowledge of and commitment to try a clinical practice recommendation are designed to build on the awareness and interest raised in phase 1. For example, comparing organizational outcomes to those described in the literature through a gap assessment and discussed during unit meetings or journal clubs from phase 1 increases clinician’s knowledge and commitment by highlighting the gap in desired performance. Like raising awareness and interest, increasing knowledge and commitment requires multifaceted ongoing attention.Educational sessions are a necessary step in raising knowledge and commitment but must be combined with other strategies to be effective.28 Educational sessions can use a variety of methods from unit in-services, readings, or online learning modules to simulation training. One method of interactive education that leverages nurses’ preference to learn from their colleagues29-31 is to engage and train change agents. There are many different change agent roles32 described in the literature, including internal and external facilitators, change champions, core groups, knowledge brokers, thought leaders, and opinion leaders (Table 1).32,34-37 In general, the change agent role involves sharing information and supporting practice changes with colleagues and may vary based on the size of the unit. Our experience indicates that the roles are not well understood by clinicians. Identifying change agents early, obtaining their support, providing education regarding the practice change, and clarifying their roles facilitate effective use of team members’ strengths and connections in the organization.

 

Table 1. Change Agent Roles

Identifying change agents from each discipline relevant to the clinical topic at hand can build commitment to change. For example, if the goal is to increase hand hygiene, including change agents from infection prevention specialists or epidemiology, microbiology personnel, nurses, nursing assistants, physicians, and someone from inventory supply would be helpful. Including facility services, the unit secretary, and housekeeping may be important so that the correct equipment (ie, a full dispenser) is always readily available and positioned in accordance with safety standards. Core group members can serve as change agents.37 Having a core group of trained change agents available to cover all shifts meets clinicians’ needs and builds expertise as clinicians seek answers through interactions with colleagues.Unlike strict research protocols, clinical practice guidelines are designed to be locally adapted to individual settings. Teams can modify them for use to create a local practice protocol.38-40 Focusing on key steps that are critical promotes adoption by simplifying the change.18,41 Articulating how the EBP was simplified to assist clinician users can promote commitment to practice changes.Building knowledge and commitment provides an essential foundation for promoting action and adoption of the EBP change. Planning for implementation should be based on a timeline allowing for a focused effort, building practitioners’ knowledge and commitment before proceeding to the next phase of implementation. If the clinical practice recommendations are to be piloted in a setting that involves a small number of practitioners (eg, a rural clinic), it may be possible to move more quickly through this phase. If the practice change involves a large number of practitioners from multiple disciplines, covering many shifts, plan for 2 to 3 weeks to help clinicians gain sufficient knowledge and to garner their commitment to the practice change. This phase of implementation should be clearly articulated with a designated go-live date approaching in the future.

Promoting Action and Adoption

After raising awareness, promoting positive attitudes, and building knowledge about the change, the next imperative is to change behavior and put recommendations into practice. What has been described as the implementation phase of an EBP process is essentially the behavior change point in the multiple phases of implementation. Interventions to promote action or adoption need to move from active to interactive and target the clinicians so they develop skills in use of the practice change. Training, role modeling, and mentoring by change agents are essential elements of the implementation plan.16,20,36,42-44 Follow-up from unit leaders and project change agents is needed for troubleshooting, reinforcing the desired behavior, and providing recognition at the point of care for correctly and consistently applying practice recommendations.Practical strategies such as practice prompts promote behavior change by providing timely reminders in the practice setting at the point of care. Practice prompts can be sophisticated clinical information system reminders incorporated in the electronic health record (EHR) or as simple as a pocket guide with a logo containing key talking points.45-47 As EHR technology develops, additional innovations will create ways to hardwire provision of some clinical practice recommendations (eg, influenza vaccinations or medication infusion dosages) by requiring justification of variations in practice (eg, skipping timed pediatric immunizations). Creating patient reminders, clinical checklists, and standing orders builds support in the system and effectively sets parameters for successful use of EBP.48-52The action and adoption phase of implementation will require several weeks to complete. During this phase, clinicians are testing practice changes, finding ways to integrate new practices into workflow, adapting the practice for unique patient circumstances, and doing small-scale evaluation.53 Several weeks are needed for progressive uptake of the EBP when change agents are actively promoting adoption, and practitioners are trying the change. Continued use of implementation strategies must occur throughout this phase as early and late adopters progress at varying rates. Participation can be encouraged by having early adopters provide timely feedback on positive results. Active implementation strategies may be used more sporadically after early adopters create sufficient momentum promoting the practice change. Audits with actionable and timely data feedback of results are essential and highly effective for both adoption and integration of practice change by building support in the organizational system.54,55 Timing should allow for trying and using the EBP change before full evaluation of process and outcome indicators.Some clinicians lag in action and adoption. Highly interactive and individualized feedback will be needed for clinicians working through adoption while the group is moving toward integration and sustainability of practice changes. Late adopters will be watching the early adopters’ progress and slowly become active adopters. Clear expectations and administrative follow-up through the performance evaluation process will facilitate action. If a small group of clinicians are slower to adopt practice recommendations, we have found that involving a group leader from the late adopters in planning and troubleshooting implementation early may be helpful. Late adopters may provide important insights into issues and propose possible solutions when designing and localizing clinical practice recommendations. In the end, noncompliance becomes the responsibility of administrators.

Pursuing Integration and Sustainability

In order to achieve a return on investment from working through the EBP process, it is essential to realize integration and sustained use of the EBP change.26,56,57 Celebrating successes through senior leadership recognition in public forums supports shifting expectations and group norms or standard operating procedures. Creating peer-to-peer discussions articulating expectations (ie, peer influence) and using comparative data are likely to be effective. Reinfusion will be needed through the early months of integration to sustain the gains already achieved. Updating postings and practice reminders keep the message fresh and in the forefront. Posters left for extended periods tend to become invisible, so content and strategies must be updated to attract the attention of busy clinicians (eg, update pictures and key points, add names of successful staff). Early and active planning for reinfusion and sustainability is highly recommended to prevent slippage, loss of early progress, or loss of momentum for changing practice.Integration of clinical practice recommendations into daily care requires additional strategies by the clinical team and senior leaders, including strategies built in the social system matching the organizational culture. Reporting results of project implementation and revisions based on evaluative data and practitioner feedback can facilitate additional commitment to sustained use of new practices. Graphic displays of key indicators may be helpful.58 Reporting and feedback of trended data support progressive integration and positive reinforcement for practitioners59,60 and assist with quick identification of the need to reinfuse the EBP.After trying and implementing the practice change, final revisions in policies, procedures, or protocols are needed.25,61 Project leader reporting of activity and results should target committees in the infrastructure responsible for policy approval, documentation, staff education, quality improvement, EBP, and product inventory.27,62,63 Reports to senior leaders should include the project purpose; use of the EBP process; impact or return on the investment; link between the project results, organizational priorities, and infrastructure supporting the EBP change. Communicating with senior leaders is strategic for garnering reinforcement, recognition, and future resources.Building the practice change in the organizational system requires use of additional strategies to promote sustainability. Financial incentives,64,65 awards, recognition,66,67 and support establish the new norms for practice. Incorporating the practice change in the competency review process and obtaining individual commitments to 1 or 2 actions during staff performance evaluations help to support unit goals and create continuous reinfusion and momentum. Building responsibility for ongoing EBP work in a new or existing unit or organizational committee will keep responsibility for the work clear and a priority supported in the infrastructure. Multiple strategies are needed to move from awareness to integration and should target clinicians, organizational leaders, and the social system.

How to Select Implementation Strategies

When planning for EBP implementation, a nursing leader should ask several questions:

  • What EBP changes have been successfully implemented previously? How were those practice changes implemented?
  • Who are stakeholders or others who might be interested in this EBP? What is the potential impact or advantage for them? What are their priorities, and how can those be addressed? How can the process be simplified and built into the system to make adoption easier for them?
  • What are barriers and facilitators to adoption of EBP? What creative solutions can address the barriers and/or optimize the facilitators?
  • What information or data are the clinicians and stakeholders accustomed to seeing? What information or data are typically shared with EBP changes?
  • How can we make this fun?
  • How can we design messages for clinicians and leaders describing the EBP that includes credible evidence, why the change is important, what the EBP change will look like, and what are the expected outcomes?

Answers to these questions provide direction for choosing from among the implementation strategies listed. Choose and use implementation strategies cumulatively from the early phases through the implementation process. Highlighting the potential advantage, key evidence, project logo, and results of a gap analysis throughout the implementation process helps busy clinicians stay focused. These questions can be revisited while adding strategies across each phase of the implementation process. EBP projects in various clinical areas may use different implementation strategies; flexibility is key (Table 2).22,68

 

Table 2. Implementation Strategies Used in Different Clinical Area Projects

Implementation is fluid, complex, highly interactive, and impacted by contextual variations. Prescriptive and rigid timing of strategies may never be appropriate.69 Critical thinking skills of nurses in evaluating and adapting strategies to the changing conditions in the clinical setting will continue to be required. Team leaders will almost certainly need to adjust or add implementation strategies as the work progresses. Wensing et al69 describe selection of implementation strategies as an “art,” stating that “research-based evidence can provide some guidance but cannot show decisively which intervention is most appropriate,” yet a structured approach to selecting implementation strategies may be helpful.69(pE85)

Conclusion

Implementation science is an emerging field with few randomized controlled trials across healthcare settings where nurses work. However, there is a growing body of important research showing the impact of a variety of implementation strategies on nurse-sensitive outcomes.28,51,57,69,70 Implementing EBP change is difficult; consequently, nursing leaders must use effective implementation strategies to engage clinicians and promote adoption of evidence-based care delivery to improve patient outcomes. Using the Evidence-Based Practice Implementation guide to select implementation strategies adds clarity to a critical and often undeveloped step in the EBP process. While gaps remain in our knowledge, this guide offers a valuable addition to practice by providing an application-oriented approach for planning implementation using evidence-based implementation strategies.

References

  • 1. Gifford W, Davies B, Edwards N, Griffin P, Lybanon V. Managerial leadership for nurses’ use of research evidence: an integrative review of the literature. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007; 4 (3): 126–145.[Context Link]
  • 2. Jeffs L, MacMillan K, McKey C, Ferris E. Nursing leaders’ accountability to narrow the safety chasm: insights and implications from the collective evidence based on health care safety. Nurse Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2009; 22 (1): 86–98.[Context Link]