Evidence-Based Practice Change Process (Graded)
The purpose of this assignment is:
- To apply a change process using the ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation and a systematic review after identifying a clinical topic of concern and related nursing practice issue.
- Your change process is to be set up as a pilot project.
Course Outcomes
This assignment will enable you to meet the following course outcomes:
CO2: Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities. (PO2)
CO3: Selects evidence for best practices when planning professional nursing care involving systems, processes, and devices for individuals, families, aggregates and communities. (PO3)
Directions
EBP Change Process (form)
- Download the EBP Change Process form
- The use of this specific form is REQUIRED
- Identify a clinical topic and related nursing practice issue you think needs to be changed.
- Locate a systematic review on your topic from the Cochrane Database of Systematic. Be sure this involves nursing actions.
- Work through each step of the ACE Star Model as outlined on the assignment form (Star Points 1-5: Discovery, Summary, Translation, Implementation, and Evaluation). Respond to the instructions provided on the form.
- Please reach out to your instructor for feedback or assistance with your PICOT question as needed.
- Required Reading in Week 1 under assignments is available for more information on the ACE Star Model.
- Please cite any references (in APA format) of your systematic review or other scholarly document as needed. Paraphrasing information, rather than quoting, is expected. No quotes for this assignment please!
- Use the grading rubric as a final way to check that all components of the form have been completed. The rubric is the tool your instructor will use to assess your content.
You must include the following in your report.
- How the information that you learned from the topic will be disseminated (e.g. to colleagues within their unit and/or clinical agency where employed, nurses within the community, at a local, state, or national conference, etc.)
- How the project would be implemented and what effects it might have.
Rubric
EBP Change Process
EBP Change Process
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeA systematic review from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was selected, identified, and was appropriate for the selected nursing change process. |
| 25.0 ptsNo Description
One systematic review from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was identified and was clearly appropriate. |
22.0 ptsNo Description
A systematic review was selected from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and was mostly appropriate for a nursing change process. |
20.0 ptsNo Description
A systematic review was selected from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and was fairly appropriate for a nursing change process. |
10.0 ptsNo Description
A systematic review was selected, but not from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and/or was not appropriate for this assignment. |
0.0 ptsNo Description
No systematic review selected or used. |
|
25.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 1 (Discovery) The topic, nursing practice issue, rationale and scope of practice were clearly identified and described. |
| 25.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 1 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed. |
22.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 1 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed. |
20.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 1 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail. |
10.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 1 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail. |
0.0 ptsNo Description
The ACE Star Model Star Point 1 was not completed. |
|
25.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 2 (Summary) The NURSING practice problem, NURSING related PICOT question, Cochrane systematic review, and other optional references, evidence summary, strength, and solutions, are listed and described. |
| 35.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 2 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed. |
31.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 2 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed. |
28.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 2 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail. |
13.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 2 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail. or were inappropriate. |
0.0 ptsNo Description
The ACE Star Model Star Point 2 was not completed. |
|
35.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 3 (Translation) Care standards, practice guidelines, or protocols; stakeholders and their roles and responsibilities; the nursing role; rationale for including certain stakeholders, and cost analysis plan are addressed. |
| 35.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 3 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed. |
31.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 3 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed |
28.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 3. was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail. |
13.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 3 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail. |
0.0 ptsNo Description
The ACE Star Model Star Point 3 was not completed. |
|
35.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 4 (Implementation) Permission process, education plan, timeline, measurable outcomes, forms, resources, and stakeholder meetings, are addressed. |
| 35.0 ptsNo Description
Start Point 4 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed |
31.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 4 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed |
28.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 4 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail. |
13.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 4 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail. |
0.0 ptsNo Description
The ACE Star Model Star Point 4 was not completed. |
|
35.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 5 (Evaluation) Reporting results, process and next steps are addressed. |
| 35.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 5 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed. |
31.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 5 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed |
28.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 5 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail. |
13.0 ptsNo Description
Star Point 5 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail. |
0.0 ptsNo Marks
The ACE Star Model Star Point 5 was not completed. |
|
35.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation was presented clearly and thoughts were well organized and logical. |
| 20.0 ptsNo Description
Information was presented clearly and thoughts were well organized and logical throughout. |
18.0 ptsNo Description
Information was presented clearly and thoughts were mainly organized and logical throughout. |
16.0 ptsNo Description
Information was presented clearly and thoughts were somewhat organized and logical throughout. |
8.0 ptsNo Description
Information was not consistently clear and/or was not consistently organized and logical. |
0.0 ptsNo Description
Information was disorganized and difficult to understand. |
|
20.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe systematic review and any other scholarly resources were properly listed in APA format. The writing includes error free grammar and spelling, and complete sentence structure. |
| 15.0 ptsNo Description
Excellent mechanics and APA formatting with minimal errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. |
13.0 ptsNo Description
Good mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column |
12.0 ptsNo Description
Fair mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column |
6.0 ptsNo Description
Poor mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column |
0.0 ptsNo Description
Very poor mechanics and formatting such that information is difficult to read. |
|
15.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment form was used |
| 0.0 ptsNo Description
10% deduction for incorrect form used Incorrect or no form used results in 22.5 points lost |
0.0 ptsNo Description
Correct Assignment Form Used results in 0 points lost |
|
0.0 pts |
| Total Points: 225.0 |