Demonstrate quality models
| You are a president of a healthcare quality improvement association in your region. Because of your astute leadership and experience leading changes requiring quality improvement efforts, you have been invited to contribute to the quarterly magazine on the application of quality improvement processes and approaches and on the contribution of thought leaders.
With this request in mind, develop a succinct article that addresses the following:
Length: 2-3 pages References: Include a minimum of 3-5 peer-reviewed, scholarly resources at the end of your article Your assignment should reflect scholarly academic writing, current APA standards, and adhere to University’s Academic Integrity Policy. Upload your document and click the Submit to Dropbox button. |
|
Rubric Name: Common Grading Rubric – 5 Points
| Criteria | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Completed few parts of the assignment and/or did not address many questions/tasks posed in the assignment instructions or assignment prompt. | Completed some parts of the assignment and/or did not address several questions/tasks posed in the assignment instructions or assignment prompt. | Completed all required parts of the assignment and addressed most of the questions/tasks posed in the assignment instructions or assignment prompt. | Completed all required parts of the assignment and addressed all questions/tasks posed in the assignment instructions or assignment prompt. | |
| No evidence of knowledge and understanding of assignment content.
No evidence of analysis of assignment content. Responses were generally not thoughtful, thorough, or well-reasoned. |
Little evidence of knowledge and understanding of assignment content.
Little evidence of analysis of assignment content. Responses were occasionally thoughtful and/or may not have been thorough or well-reasoned |
Some evidence of knowledge and understanding of assignment content.
Some evidence of analysis of assignment content. Responses were mostly thoughtful, thorough, and well-reasoned. |
Strong evidence of knowledge and understanding of assignment content.
Detailed evidence of analysis of assignment concept. Responses were thoughtful, thorough, and well-reasoned |
|
| Resources are not scholarly and/or peer-reviewed; and/or were of poor quality and/or not appropriate for the assignment. | Some resources are scholarly and/or peer-reviewed; and/or were of good quality and/or appropriate for the assignment. | Most resources are scholarly and/or peer-reviewed; and/or were of good quality and/or appropriate for the assignment. | Resources are scholarly and/or peer-reviewed and were of excellent quality and/or appropriate for the assignment. | |
| Numerous misspelled words and grammatical errors.
APA formatting not used. |
Frequently misspells words and/or makes consistent grammatical errors.
Numerous APA formatting issues. |
Occasionally misspells words and/or some grammatical errors.
Minor APA formatting issues. |
No or very few misspelled words and/or no or very few grammatical errors.
No APA formatting issues |
|
| Overall Score |