Assessment Description

  • Post category:Nursing
  • Reading time:10 mins read

Assessment Description
Develop a presentation video (voice-over PowerPoint, Prezi, etc.) that covers all major areas of your project. For the presentation, use Loom to create a 10-12 minute voice-over or a video.

Be sure to address:

– site / organization

– needs assessment results (or how you knew of the need for your project)

– project topic

– project goals

– project outcome (or anticipated outcome if not implemented)

How was your project received by stakeholders?

If you implemented your project, how will it be sustained? If it is not sustainable, how will the one-time implementation make a difference?

If you did not implement your project, how did you perform a hand-off for the next steps?

Ultimately, what did you learn from this project?

Include an additional slide for References at the end.

Refer to the Class Resources for additional guidance on recording your presentation with Loom.

Submit only a Word Document with the link to your video.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Rubric Criteria

Total60 points

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target
Documentation of Sources

Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

0 points

Sources are not documented.

2.4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

2.64 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2.76 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of errors.

Presentation of Content 0 points

Content lacks a clear point of view or logical sequence of information. Little persuasive information is included. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

4.8 points

Content is vague in conveying a point of view or does not create a strong sense of purpose. Some persuasive information is included.

5.28 points

Presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.

5.52 points

Content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Persuasive information from reliable sources is included.

6 points

Content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

2.4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

2.64 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

2.76 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

Stakeholders

Stakeholders

0 points

Presentation and voice over do not include how the project was received by stakeholders.

3.84 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of how the project was received by stakeholders is incomplete or incorrect.

4.22 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of how the project was received by stakeholders lacks relevant supporting details.

4.42 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of how the project was received by stakeholders includes relevant supporting details.

4.8 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of how the project was received by stakeholders includes substantial relevant supporting details.

Needs Assessment Results

Needs Assessment Results

0 points

Presentation and voice over do not include needs assessment results.

2.88 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of needs assessment results is incomplete or incorrect.

3.17 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of needs assessment results lacks relevant supporting details.

3.31 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of needs assessment results include relevant supporting details.

3.6 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of needs assessment results includes substantial relevant supporting details.

Site/Organization

Site/Organization

0 points

Presentation and voice over do not include site/organization.

2.88 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of site/organization is incomplete or incorrect.

3.17 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of site/organization lacks relevant supporting details.

3.31 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of site/organization include relevant supporting details.

3.6 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of site/organization includes substantial relevant supporting details.

Project Goals

Project Goals

0 points

Presentation and voice over do not include the project goals.

3.84 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of the project goals are incomplete or incorrect.

4.22 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of the project goals lack relevant supporting details.

4.42 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of the project goals include relevant supporting details.

4.8 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of the project goals includes substantial relevant supporting details.

Project Sustainability or Hand-off for Next Steps

Project Sustainability or Hand-off for Next Steps

0 points

Presentation and voice over do not include a discussion of project sustainability or hand-off for next steps.

3.84 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of project sustainability or hand-off for next steps are incomplete or incorrect.

4.22 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of project sustainability or hand-off for next steps lack relevant supporting details.

4.42 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of project sustainability or hand-off for next steps include relevant supporting details.

4.8 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of project sustainability or hand-off for next steps include substantial relevant supporting details.

Language Use and Audience Awareness

Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

4.8 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

5.28 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

5.52 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

6 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

Reflection on Project

Reflection on Project

0 points

Presentation and voice over do not include a reflection on what was learned from the project.

3.84 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of what was learned from the project is incomplete or incorrect.

4.22 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of what was learned from the project lacks relevant supporting details.

4.42 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of what was learned from the project lacks relevant supporting details.

4.8 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of what was learned from the project includes substantial relevant supporting details.

Project Outcome

Project Outcome

0 points

Presentation and voice over do not include the project outcome or anticipated outcome.

3.84 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of the project outcome or anticipated outcome are incomplete or incorrect.

4.22 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of the project outcome or anticipated outcome lack relevant supporting details.

4.42 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of the project outcome or anticipated outcome include relevant supporting details.

4.8 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of the project outcome or anticipated outcome includes substantial relevant supporting details.

Project Topic

Project Topic

0 points

Presentation and voice over do not include the project topic.

3.84 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of the project topic is incomplete or incorrect.

4.22 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of the project topic lacks relevant supporting details.

4.42 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of the project topic include relevant supporting details.

4.8 points

Presentation and voice over’s inclusion of the project topic includes substantial relevant supporting details.

Layout

Layout

0 points

Layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read, with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

4.8 points

Layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting, with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

5.28 points

Layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts from or does not enhance readability.

5.52 points

Layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

6 points

Layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.